Halliburton Energy Services has pled guilty to destroying evidence involved in the 2010 Gulf Oil spill. 
You  probably remember the 2010 fiasco where millions of gallons of oil  spilled into the Gulf of Mexico after a BP oil rig caught fire and  exploded, killing 11 workers.
Well, after that incident BP tried  to blame Halliburton, its cement contractor, for shoddy construction of  the oil well's production casing. Production casing, among other things,  keeps the oil well from erupting under pressure and uses centralizers  to keep it centered away from the well walls.
Apparently when  Halliburton advised BP, it recommended using 21 centralizers but BP  ignored the advice and decided to go with six.
Now I don't know that much about the physics of this, but I have a hard time believing that 6 can do the same job as 21. 
What  helped BP's case though was that Halliburton showed them a 3-D  simulation of the well using 21 and six centralizers and in the  simulation, there was little difference between the two. Halliburton  employees were allegedly directed to destroy the model after the oil  spill. The model still hasn't been recovered.
The US Justice  Department filed a charge against Halliburton for destroying the  evidence and today it announced that Halliburton pled guilty, agreeing  to a $200,000 dollar fine and a 3-year probation.(
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/Ju...)
Essentially  Halliburton admitted that it had backed up BP's decision to cut corners  and then tried to make amends by pleading guilty and donating $55  million to the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
So what do you think  about this? Was it Halliburton's fault for showing a faulty model or  were both parties guilty for cutting corners? And what do you think  about off shore drilling? Should this practice continue even if it  threatens the cleanliness of our water and the health of sea life? Let  us know in the comment section below and don't forget to like, subscribe  and share this video with your friends